Friday, March 21, 2014

Strata 2014 - Newbie Perspective

Marc Andreessen noticed that software is eating the world.  I see the same thing with Big Data.  Big Data is shaping the world around us.  It has been used on presidential elections, weather reports, consumer analysis/sentiment, fraud check, etc.   Strata conference is the epicenter of new technologies, use cases, and new innovations related to Big Data.  I've been meaning to go there for quite some time.  Previously, I purchased the videos from O'Reilly because I couldn't make it.  Thanks to my current company, 3C (they're pretty awesome), I was able to go along with five of my coworkers.  It's the place where you can meet the experts, the main committers, and ask them questions.  If your eyes get dilated when you talk of Hadoop, or you get exited when you need to solve a problem that has to do with a huge amount of data including the famous "three V's" (volume, velocity, and variety), then this conference is for you.  This is a quick summary of my experience of the conference.

The conference revolved around four clusters:

  1. How quickly can you get the data into your system (ingest)
  2. How fast can you show the results
  3. It's all about presentation (charts)
  4. Big Data doesn't mean Hadoop


How Quickly Can You Get Data


The presentation that left me mesmerized was Spark!  I can't wait to use it.  It is a very compelling product and it's now backed up by Cloudera.  With Spark you can do the following:
  • Get a compute engine for Hadoop data - no need to reinvent the wheel
  • Speed up! A 100% faster MapReduce engine
  • Sophisticated: it runs all the sophisticated algorithms.  Get access to a library of sophisticated algorithms
  • A a big community behind it; the most popular Big Data open source (followed by Hadoop)
  • Learning from the big guys - Yahoo!, Conviva, and Cloudera are using it
Not to mention that it comes integrated with a analytic suite (Shark), a large-scale graph processing (Bagel), and real-time analysis (Spark Streaming).  This is nice because rather than doing Hive, Hadoop, and Mahout, and Storm, I only have to learn one programming paradigm.

How Fast Can You Show The Results


Twitter explains how they monitor millions (+5,700 tweets per second) of Time Series.  The presentation was superb.  I found out that the stack that they're using, named "Observability", is composed on: Finnagle, Cassandra, and query language and execution engines based on Scala.  Although is a work in progress the stack is about three years old.  I hope that they open-sourced it stack so I can get more context on how they monitor a large distributed system.  

Another very interesting product was Google's Big Query.  This was one of those presentations in which we (my team and I) stumbled upon by accident.  The presentation showed how to use Google's toolkit: Freebase, Maps, and BigQuery to do analytics.

It's All About Context, Results, or Charts


Another company that impressed me was Trifacta.  With their tool you can clean data, see the model (graph) and recursively do it again in case you see patterns or not.  The tool is targeted to data scientists, data wranglers, and data analysts.  It's a great tool to mine data data, but most important, you can clean the data and show the results with relative ease.

IPython: This rekindled my interest in Python.  IPythons notebooks are great for data scientists.  You can get code, text, and graphics all in one page, so it's the perfect tool to show quick results.  It's not that Python wasn't a popular language for data scientists.  NumPy library provides a solid MATLAB-like matrix data structure, with efficient matrix and vector operations.  It also provides other great APIs like SciPy and Pandas.

Big Data != Hadoop


Two topics that opened my eyes were Mesos and YARN.  Mesos, what Twitter uses to manage its clusters, is similar to YARN (Yet Another Resource Negotiator).  The Hadoop 2.0, or YARN, it's becoming more of an environment and operating system; not just a MapReduce.  With YARN, the JobTracker is gone.  The ResourceManager is what does the job of the JobTracker.  The ResourceManager (RM) is a scheduler - it allocates resources based on a pluggable scheduling algorithm. RM manages and monitors all the applications, so it strictly limits to arbitrating available resources.

One of our favorite (me and two of my buddies), was Netflix Data Platform by Kurt Brown.  A different and a great presentation.  Rather than going on the technology side, they explained how the culture is intertwined with their technology stack or decisions.  For example, they talked about the reason for using "the cloud".  Obvious reasons like: it's cheaper, much flexible (growth, a better place to do tests/spikes), and having multi data center is definitely a plus.  Also, Amazon and RackSpace have great services such as SQL, EMR, and S3.  But the main reason is "focus".  They are focused on getting movies and increasing their audience rather than to focus on the "plumbing".  They expressed their commitment to "open-source software" (OSS).  They mentioned the great talent that they can get and how they can "manage their own destiny" by following these principles and using these tools.

Netflix explained their philosophy and how it's the "soul" of their decision (technical and business).  For example, they keep keyboards, mice, and other peripherals in vending machines (they are free), so that everyone knows to "act in Netflix best interest".  Furthermore, every decision or project needs to answer a basic question: "what value are you adding?".  They apply the rule "accept that things will break".  Because of this, they build safety nets around their systems.  Again, it was a very nice and interesting presentation.

I really enjoyed the conference.  I also just purchased the videos.  Which I highly recommend!!  During the next few months, I'm going to try to learn some of these tools and present them at the Miami JVM Meetup.  Hopefully I can get to see you there, or better yet, hope to see you at Strata 2015.  If you're going to either one of these events, let's meet up and share a beer...or two and discuss Big Data.  I promise that my eyes will get dilated.



Monday, March 17, 2014

El Dilema de Ser Buen Samaritano o Come Mierda

Siempre me a gustado ayudar a la gente, pero hay veces me pongo a pensar…soy "buen samaritano" o un "come mierda"?  Desde pequeño me gusto salir y hablar.  Mi mamá siempre me dijo que hablo “hasta por los codos”.  Lo que he notado es que ahora, muchas personas me suelen hablar y pedirme por cosas.  Algunas personas se acercan a mi para venderme algo, y otras para ayudarlas.  La verdad es que muchas personas dicen que yo soy un muchacho “agradable”, otras personas dicen que soy “simpatico” (me gusta), yo a veces pienso que tengo cara de "come mierda”.  Por ejemplo, es común que cuando voy a un mall, siempre las personas que tienen una tienda en un kiosco, siempre me llaman, “señor, le limpio el reloj?" o "Joven, tengo esto en especial.”  Siempre termino en decir, “no gracias" con mi sonrisa y sigo adelante, para que…para encontrarme con otros dos muchacho/as que me van a preguntar lo mismo.  Esto es muy común para mi.  Mi esposa siempre me dice que vea abajo para que no me persigan, pero hasta eso!  La otra ves, caminando en un estacionamiento con mi familia, una señora me paro en plena calle y me llamo.  Luego me dijo, “me puedes hacer un favor, se me desamarro mi zapato, me lo amarras?”  Y que es lo que hice?  Pues lo amarre…como buen come mierda.  Para consolarme, la señora era una anciana obesa.  Pero aun así, de todas las personas, tuve que ser yo?  Mi ultima escena de “buen samaritano” fue la otra ves que fui a desayunar con mi familia.  Apenas salí de el carro, un señor me vio y me dijo que su carro lo encerro con las llaves dentro de el vehículo.  Yo se, medio bruto el personaje, pero también yo soy super despistado - lo entiendo.  “Me puedes llevar a casa para agarrar mis llaves de repuesto?  Vivo bien cerca.”  Mi esposa solo me vio, me dio un sonrisa, y me dijo que mientras iba a agarrar la mesa con los niños.

La verdad muchas veces me pongo a pensar, “voy a ponerme así, todo cabrón y mandar al diablo a esa gente”.  Pero no es como soy yo.  Como dije, me encanta hablar!  Cuando hice mi ultima “labor” de buen samaritano, le pregunte a el señor (algo mayor) que cuantas personas le había preguntado.  El me respondió fui el primero, “tienes la pinta de ser amable”.  Yo pensé, "mas bien, cara de come mierda.”

Después de tanto tiempo así, viéndolo en retrospectiva, no solamente me da mucho agrado ayudar, pero también me ha ido muy bien con mis pequeñas labores.  Como dije, se siente bien ayudar a la gente.  Ademas, creo que da un buen ejemplo a mis dos hijos (tengo uno de doce y otra de 3 que cree que tiene trece).  Y más aun cuando lo haces sin pensarlo mucho o pedir algo en cambio.  Aunque nunca he pedido nada, siempre termino notando cosas bonitas.  Como cuando el señor que dejo las llaves en el carro pago mi desayuno, en el caso de el año pasado alguien me compro un par de zapatos de $120, solamente porque tenia cara de buena gente.  Al parecer, a los de cara de come mierda, tiene mucha suerte.

Un abrazo!
Marcelo

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Disruptive Possibilities: How Big Data Changes Everything

I was looking forward to this book because of the title. I was under the impression that I was going to find concrete examples on how Big Data has affected and disrupted some industries. Best of all, I thought that I was going to read what industries will be impacted and how.  The book showed some examples at the end, but in my opinion, it leaves something very important: speed and sophistication. 

I just came back from Strata 2014, which is why I was looking forward to this book, and when I heard Matei Zaharia's keynote, it was all I needed to know about the current disruption of big data. Nowadays, big data storage is becoming commoditized, so the best value added is speed (how quick you can get the answer of your problem) and sophistication (run the best algorithms on the data). The book doesn't mentioned this but it might be because of its age - things are moving super quick on Big Data.

Some of the things that the book does well:
  • Introduces some history about the Big Data problem
  • How it affected some of the silos technologies like RDBS
  • How they solve the scalability issue
If you are a manager or someone that has no understanding of the world of Big Data, then I would recommended.  However, if you are a developer, data scientist, or data wrangler, then this book will be too basic.  The one thing that I highly recommend, if you are interested in this subject, is to attend (or at least purchase the videos) of Strata.

You can get the book here.

Happy reading,
Marcelo

Thursday, December 26, 2013

My best decision of 2013

I started working at 3CInteractive (3Ci) as of March 29th, this is perhaps the best place that I’ve ever worked at.  This is a brief post of why this was my best decision of the year.  I didn’t want to write this post until the honeymoon period was over (usually after 4 months).  There were three factors that helped me make the decision (and why I continue loving) to work at 3Ci: 
  • Culture: I wanted to work for a company who looked at IT as an innovation engine rather than a cost center.
  • Team: I wanted to work with awesome engineers (very motivated, smart, and with a lot of experience).  Also, I wanted to be the dumbestperson in the room.
  • Tackle big harry audacious goals: To be part of a company whose products revolve around big problems that would (without a doubt) have an impact to the bottom line.

I was introduced to 3Ci in 2007 when I was trying to sell a startup that I was working for by the name of Up-Mobile.  The startup wasn’t doing well in the US market, so I was handed the task of selling our customer based to another company.  During that time, I met with 3Ci’s senior management and some of their architects.  Their company was doing some similar things as our startup, unlike us though, they were able to evolve quick and found a potential market with top tier companies and a compelling product.  Many of 3Ci programmers were very involved in open source projects.  For good or bad, I was attached to Up-Mobile and I wasn’t ready to make a move.  Nevertheless, 3Ci left a great impression.  Later down the line, I became the organizer of the Miami Java User Group (MJUG) and Miami JVM Meetup.  3Ci was more than helpful to provide a venue, food, and beverage with no strings attached.  There was a big turnaround of 3Ci employees when I did presentations.  It turned out that they also do a lot of presentations on things that they are doing.  Also, they are committed to open source projects while keeping away from the golden hammer anti pattern - if you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.  They had the motto of using the best tool for the problem.


Culture

When a lot of people think about the culture of a company, they think about the things that they can see and touch.  When you enter 3Ci, you’ll see the graffiti on the walls, the cool paintings, the guitars, motorcycles, and the free food.  But this is a byproduct of culture.  At 3Ci we have three rules that are unbendable:
  • Build a sustainable company in the emerging market for enterprise mobile services
  • Create a great culture that focuses on the personal and professional development of our team
  • Do important work for quality clients

I came from a couple of small companies or startups (with less than 20 people).  When you work for a small company, you not only know everyone’s name, but you know what everyone is doing and why.  Although 3Ci has more than 100 people, and many of them are distributed, everyone on the team understands what the goals are because of these three rules.  The culture is what promotes the exceptional people working there, the proactive and ownership of tasks, breed result-focused, and the team.  3Ci's culture have created a set of values based on this culture:

We are not in the business for the business alone but for a higher purpose - to make lives better, to solve important problems, and to enjoy what we do. Our Data Scientist, Oliver, once said, “Don’t live a life to do a great work.  Live a great life, and then the great work will follow”.

3Ci strives to be one of the best places you will ever work.
Time and time again, you see that we become either the best place in South Florida to work or America’s most promising company.

We’re in it together
There is a sense of, “let me know if I can help” within 3Ci.  It’s also okay to fail as long as you learn from your mistakes.  The head of our data team, Gabe, once said to me, “Do not do things when you are frustrated or under pressure.  Rather do them when you're calm.  You don’t want to make things worse by doing yet another mistake”.  He is also the first one that holds my feet to the fire when something goes wrong.  The same goes with Alex, my boss and head of the Software Engineering.  It’s not a “don’t let it happen again”.  It’s more like, “We really messed up.  Why did it happen? What’s the root-cause of the problem.  Can we make sure that this doesn’t happen again through some process? Can we automate this issue?"

We’re champions of change
We need to change quickly and adapt.  Anyone with some experience knows this, but the one that are constantly thinking are those entrepreneurs that work at startups.  I learned early on my career that the life a technology company is composed of three: you either go big, stay small, or be eaten.  This was mentioned by Mike FitzGibbon (Fitz), president and cofounder, at the company's "All Hands Call", we need to be customer-centric and be able to quickly and effectively execute goals.


Team

One of the main engineers at 3Ci during 2007 was Alejandro (Alex), and I met him on an open source project (Kannel).  I checked some of his code, and I really like what he was doing.  But the best things about him was his curiosity.  He was a system administrator at 3Ci, yet he was learning Java at that time and committing to Kannel.  I was also a good friend with the one of the main committers and founder of Kannel, Stipe Tolj.  Stipe was also working for 3Ci as a consultant and knew Alex personally.  He told me about some of the things that the company was doing, and I was intrigued to say the least.  After a couple of e-mails, Alex and I pretty much hit it off.  At that time he was working in Europe, then he was promoted and moved to 3Ci (Boca Raton, FL).  The moment that I found out, I immediately sent him my resume.  During my interview, I met a couple of guys: Mauricio and Carlos (Carlitos).  Two of their best architects.  This is another way of knowing how good the company, they had a good technical interview process.  The interview was hard but I did well, so I was hired.  I’ve never looked back.  I highly enjoy it, and it’s the reason of why I make the 1.5 hour commute on Tuesday and Thursday from Kendall to Boca Raton.

One of my favorite quotes is "Hire the most amazing people you can. Communicate goals.  Turn them loose.  Profit."  - Sam Schillance, Box.  One of my rules of working at a job is to be surrounded by great engineers, then see how much they complain about my code.  This is by far why I love this company.  Again, It’s not the graffiti, nor the free food (which is delicious), nor the fact that I work remotely from Miami.  It’s the engineers that I work with.  When I started, I met a few great engineers.  People from my team are former Googlers, people who worked at Bloomberg, current Apache committers, and entrepreneurs.  Just a great set of interesting people who love to code and yet find a way to find a life after work - teachers, band players, great parents, rock climbers, etc.  For the past nine months, I’ve learn more than any other company in my professional career, both personally and technically.  Don’t get me wrong, it’s a very competitive company!  The bar is raised high the moment you are hired, and the expectations are tremendous, but the safety net of the team is why I have a smile on my face every time I come to work.  For example, there are five people that I always turn to in case I have any questions: Gabe, Alex, Tyler, Oliver, and Rob.  In my view, these guys composed the core of the technology of 3Ci.  They have a tons of experience, are highly innovated, smart, charismatic, and a great set of guys.  Together, I call them my G.A.T.O.R team and it’s such a pleasure working with them.


My final interview was with one of the founders and COO, Mark Smith.  One of his questions was, “What do you want to do in the future?”.  I told him that I wanted to eventually start my own company, learn Machine Learning,  and keep running MJUG and Miami JVM Meetup.  He said, “Awesome, we’ll help you”.  Done!  After that, I was asking “Where do I sign?"  Mark and Alex are by far the best leaders that I ever had.  They know when to help the team, and when to get out of their way.  If you worked for more than 10 years, then you’ll know that it’s hard to find a good company, even harder to find a good leader that could be a mentor.


Big Hairy Audacious Goals



Another huge incentive for me was to be able to tackle what James Collins calls, “Big Hairy Audacious Goals”.  Although I can’t say anything about the goals for the company, trust me, they are as big as they are interesting.  This is what motivates me.  The fact that I work with an awesome team tackling some really big problems, help set the path of pushing the envelop as much as we can.  Because of this, we look at other technologies and think outside the norm.  I believe that there is a challenge-to-great-developers matrix
.  In my experience, great engineers gravitate to hard challenges.  This is where I want to be.  I don’t want to work on another CRUD application (been there, done that, got the t-shirt!)  I believe that the best combination of retention of great engineers is to have great challenges for them to solve, have a great culture, and provide the best atmosphere for them.

I’ve always want to work for a company like 3Ci and I’m glad to be part of it.  It’s hard to find companies such as these in South Florida.  3Ci is committed to hire the best.  They are also very much focused on the culture.  The best way that I can describe its culture is using this quote, “When you combine a culture of discipline with an ethic of entrepreneurship, you get the magical alchemy of great performance" - Jim Collins, Good to Great.  I once read that you should choose a profession that you enjoy and that serves as many people as possible.  Focusing on serving others - not on building wealth.  Serve well and money will follow.  I’m glad that this year I was able to scratch that one from my “to-do” list.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Functional Thinking Video Review

I view new programming languages like president candidates, I don't trust them.  They believe that by being in office (projects), everything will be better.  When functional programming started its hype I watched from afar.  This was until I was working for a stock trading firm with lots of financial algorithms and lots of multithreaded application.  Before this gig, my languages of choice have been pure Java and Groovy. The world of Scala, Clojure, Haskell, and Erlang was just a bunch of noise. I was skeptical about this presentation, but I am a fan of Neal Ford so I decided to give it a shot.  Overall, I was very pleased with the content mainly because it did not focused on syntax, it focused on context! "Functional" is more a way of thinking than a tool set. For anyone to understand functional programming you need to understand the concepts, and Neal achieved this in his presentation.

 Neal points out the major advantages of using functional programming:

  1. Language Evolution: all major languages are adding functional features. 
  2. Results over steps: create optimized applications to solve a problem rather than using frameworks
  3. Immutability: the freedom of not worrying about the state of the objects - "failure atomicity" 
Then, he elaborates a bit more on the subject matter. For example:

  • First-class/higher-order functions 
  • Pure Functions 
  • Recursion 
  • Strict Evaluation 
If you want to see more, check out the videos here or check this video for introduction.

Friday, May 31, 2013

Configure MTR in Mac

To configure MTR do the following:
First Install brew
Install MTR using the following commands:
Unfortunately, the configuration installs in the /usr/local/sbin
What I end up doing is removing the symbolic link and point it to my bin

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Personal MBA Book Review

Just finished reading The Personal MBA: Master the art of business by Jorge Kaufman. I have an Executive MBA from the University of Miami (UM or "The U"), so I was very skeptical at the beginning. However, I really enjoyed the book. First of all, there is a lot of stuff that I learned during my MBA, but as he puts it towards the end of the book,
Educating yourself about anything is a Tao - there's no end to the process. The journey itself is the reward.
If you are the type of person that wants to learn more about business, I highly recommend it.  The book distilles a series amount of great books into one.  Here's what you learn:
  • how businesses work
  • how people work (chapter 6 -8)
  • how systems work (chapter 9-11) 
You shouldn't expect:
  • Manager and leadership overload. 
  • Finance and accounting. 
  • Financial intelligence for entrepreneurs 
  • How to read a financial report 
  • Quantitative analysis: thinking statistics, turning numbers into knowledge 
The one thing that I kept using while reading was a notebook and pen handy.  I also tried to review this every month.

I found it kind of sad that the book didn't covered any quantitative analysis in this analytic age, but I was happy that he covered how systems work.  This is the chapter that really resonated with me.  Here are my notes on the systems chapters.

Analyzing Systems

Deconstruction: the only way to analyze a complex system is by deconstructing it. "Deconstruction is the process of separating complex systems into the smallest possible sybsystems in order to understand how things work." You need to find the "ins" and "outs" of the system for you to understand it. Unable to understand complex systems, you need to decompose them into smaller systems for you to understand them.

Measurement: You need to measure the systems so you know if it's doing fine or not. "Measurement helps us avoid the absence blindness when analyzing systems. Remember: we have a hard time seeing things that aren't present. Measuring different parts of a system in operation helps to identify potential issues before they arise." One example is diabetes, a person needs to measure its blood glucose to know if it's too high or too low. A person cannot tell the level of glucose unless he/she measures it.

Key Performance Indicator (KPI): some measurements are better than others. Key performance indicator tell you exactly the status of your system. "Key performance indicators are measurements of the ciritical parts of a system. Measurements that don't help you make improvements to your system are worse than worthless: they are a waste of your limited attention and energy." Few questions the author used to identify business' KPI:

  • Value Creation: how quickly is the system creating value? What is the current level of inflows?
  • Marketing: how many people are paying attention to your offer? How many prospects are giving you permission to provide more information?
  • Sales: how many prospects are becoming paying customers? What is the average customer's lifetime value?
  • Value Delivery: how quickly can you server each customer? What is your current returns or complaints rate?
  • Finance: what is your profit margin? How much purchasing power do you have? Are you financially sufficient?

Analytical Honesty: always look into data without discrimination of personal feeling. "Analytical honesty means measuring and analyzing the data you have dispassionately. Since humans are social creatures, we tend to care deeply about how other perceive us, which give us a natural incentive to make things look better than they actually are. If you purpose is to actually make things better, this tendency can get in the way of collecting accurate data and conducting useful analysis.

Sampling: is the process of taking at random a small percentage of the total output, then using it as a proxy for the entire system. If you ever had blood taken at the doctor's office, you'll have a good idead of what sampling entails. 

Margin of Error: this entails on the percentage of accuracy your system has based on tests. "Is an estimate of how much you can trust your conclusions from a given set of observed samples." When it comes to analytical confidence, more data is always better. 

Ratio: is a method of comparing two measurements against each other. By diving your results by your input, you can measure all sorts of useful relationships between different parts of your system. Here are some useful ratios to track:
  • Return on promotions: for every $1 you spend in advertising, how much revenue do you collect?
  • Profit from Employee: for every person you employ, how much profit does your business generate?
  • Closing Ratio: for every prospect you serve, how many purchase?
  • Returns/Complains Ratio: for every sale you make, how many choose to return or complain?
Typically: identifying a normal or typical value for some important measurement. There are four common methods of calculating a typical value: mean, median, mode, and midrange.
  • mean: average
  • median: sort the values in order of high to low, then finding the quantity of the data point in the middle of the range. Median are actually a specific form of analysis called a percentile: the median is the value that expresses the fiftieth percentile. By definition, 50% of the values in the set will be below the median.
  • mode: is the value that occurs most frequently in a set of data. Modes are useful for finding clusters of data - a set can have multiple modes, which can alert you to potentially interesting interdependencies in the system that produced that data.
  • midrange: is the value halfway between the highest and lowest data points i a set of values. To calculate the midrange, add the highest and lowest values, then divide by two. Midranges are best used for quick estimates - they're fast, and you only need to know two data points, but they can be easily skewed by outliers that are abnormally high or low - Bill Gate's bank balance.

Correlation and Causation: causation is a complete chain of cause and effect. Correlation is not causation. Just because you can here illegal doesn't make you a criminal. Causation is always more difficult to prove than correlation. When analyzing complex systems with many variables and interdependencies, it's often extremely difficult to find true causality. 

Norms: are measures that use historical data as a tool to provide context for current measurements. If you are selling Christmas ornaments, it's a waste to compare them Q4 with Q2. You should compare this Q4 with the previous Q4. 

Proxy: measures one quantity by measuring something else. Used with care, proxies can help you measure the measurable - just be sure your proxy is directly and highly correlated with the subject of interest.

Segmentation: is a technique that involves splitting a dataset into well-defined subgroups to add additional context. Finding out that last quarter's sales increased by 20% is good, but knowing that they were done by 80% of women is even better. There are three common ways to segment customer data: past performance, demographics, and psychographics.
  • Past performance: segments customers by past known action. For example, you can segment customer sales data using previous sales data, comparing sales to new customers with sales to customers who have previously purchase from you. Lifetime value calculations are a form of segmentation by past performance.
  • demographics segments customers by external personal characteristics. Personal information like age, gender, income, nationality, and location can help you determine which customers are your probable purchasers.
  • psychographics: segments customers by internal psychological characteristics. Typically discovered via surveys, assessments, or focus groups.

Improving Systems:

Optimization: this is the process of maximizing the output of a system or minimizing a specific input the system requires to operate. Optimization typically revolves around the systems and processed behind your "key performance indicators", which measure the critical elements of the system as a whole. Improve your KPIs, and your system will perform better. 

Refactoring: the process of re-engineering the systems to improve efficiency without changing its output. The primary benefit of refactoring isn't improving the output - it's making the system itself faster or more efficient. 

The Critical Few: this is the 80/20 rule from Vilfredo Pareto.
For best results, focus on the critical inputs that produce most of the results you want.
Finding the inputs that produce the outputs you want, then make them the focus of your time and energy. Ruthlessly weed out the rest. 

Diminishing Return: after a certain point, having more of something can actually be detrimental. In the book the author explains about his work at P&G. At this company, he was the one in charge of analyzing the results of his advertising (tv spots). After time, the commercial will "wear out". That's the effect of diminishing return. "Optimize and refacgtor up to the point you start experiencing diminishing returns, then focus on doing something else".

Friction: Every business process has some amount of friction. The key is to identify areas where friction currently exists, then experiment with small improvements that will reduce the amount of friction in the system.

Automation: refers to a system or process that can operate without human intervention.
Find a way to automate your system, and you open the doors to scale via duplication and multiplication, improving your ability to create and deliver value to more paying customers.

The Paradox of Automation: the more efficient the automated system, the more crucial the contribution of the human operators of that system. When an error happens, operators need to identify and fix the situation quickly or shut the system down - otherwise, the automated system will continue multiplying the error. 

The Irony of Automation: the more reliable the system, the less human operators have to do, so the less they pay attention to the system while it's in operation. Remember the Mackworth Clock and vigilance studies conducted on British radar operators in WWII from our discussion on Novelty? Humans get bore extremely quickly if things stay the same, and the more reliable the system, the more things stay the same. 

Keep your automated system's operators mentally engaged, and they'll be far more likely to notice when errors inevitably occur. 

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP): is a predefined process used to complete a task or resolve a common issue. Business systems often include repetitive tasks or resolve a common issue. Well-defined standard operating procedures are useful because they reduce friction and minimize will power depletion. Instead of wasting valuable time and energy solving a problem that has already been solved many times before, a predefined SOP ensures that you spend less time thrashing and more time adding value. 

Don't let your standard operating procedure lapse into bureaucracy. Remember, the purpose of an SOP is to minimize the amount of time and effort it takes to complete a task or solve a problem effectively. If the SOP requires effort without providing value, it's friction. 

Checklist: a checklist is an externalized, predifined standard operating procedure for completing a specific task. Checklist will help you define a system for a process that hasn't yet been formalized. Second, using checklists as a normal part of working can help ensure that you don't forget to handle important steps that are easily overlooked when things get busy. 

Checklist can produce major improvements in your ability to do quality work, as well as your ability to delegate work effectively. By taking the time to explicitly describe and track your progress, you reduce the likelihood of major errors and oversights, as well as prevent willpower depletion associated with figuring out how to complete the same task over and over again. 

Cessation: is the choice to intentionally stop doing something that's counterproductive. In The One-Straw Revolution, Masanobu Fukuoka wrote about his experiments with natural farming, which mostly involved letting nature take its course and intervening as little as possible. Instead of trying to do too much, Fukuoka only did what was absolutely necessary. As a result, his fields were consistently among the most productive in the are. 

Cessation takes guts. It's often unpopular to unpalatable to do nothing even if doing nothing is actually the right solution. 

Resilience: what business needs is more turtles and fewer tigers. Turtles are nature's tank - they can eat different food, go through hibernation if times are tough, and shelter from an enemy if needed. Tigers depends on their strength, speed, and pray to live. If prey becomes scarce or they lose their hunting powers due to age or injury, death takes them quickly and mercilessly. This is why turtles live longer than tigers. 

Resilience is a massively underrated quality in business. Having the toughness and flexibility to handle anything life throws at you is a major asset that can save your skin.
What makes a business resilient:
  • low (preferably zero) outstanding debt
  • low overhead, fixed costs, and operating expenses
  • substantial cash reserves for unexpected contingencies
  • multiple independent product/industries/lines of business
  • flexible workers/employees who can handle many responsibilities well
  • no single points of failure
  • fail-safes/backup systems for all core process
Planning for resilience as well as performance is the hallmark of good management.
Fail-safe: is a backup system design to prevent or allow recovery from a primary system failure. As much as possible never have a single critical point of failure. 

Stress testing: is the process of identifying the boundaries of a system by simulating specific environmental conditions. 
 
Scenario Planning: is the process of systematically constructing a series of hypothetical situations, then mentally simulating what you would do if they occurred. Most large business use scenario planning as the basis of a practice called "hedging": purchasing various forms of insurance to reduce the risk of unfavorable future events. 
 
Don't waste time trying to predict an unknowable future - construct the most likely scenarios and plan what you'll do if they occur, and you'll be prepared for whatever actually happens. 

The Middle Path: is the ever-changing balance point between too little and too much - just enough. 

The Experimental Mind-set: constant experimentation is the only way you can identify what will actually produce the result you desire. Often, the best (or only) way to learn things is to jump in and try.
You learn the most from what doesn't go well. As long as your mistakes don't kill you, paying attention to what doesn't work can give you useful information you can use to discover what does.